Reactor Core Behavior of NUR Research Reactor during a Protected Fast Loss of Flow Accident

Authors

  • Djalal Hamed Nuclear Research Center of Draria, Algiers, Algeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38208/ete.v5.1175

Keywords:

Transient Conditions, Thermal hydraulic, Code system Relap5, Nuclear research reactor, Safety analysis, Loss of flow accident

Abstract

The best estimate thermal hydraulic codes are the most used code for thermal hydraulic and safety analysis of nuclear reactors, regarding their ability to provide a more realistic nuclear reactor behavior during normal and transient operating conditions. Moreover, the use of such codes is essential in order to ensure safe and reliable operation of nuc­lear reactors. In this study, for safety assessment purposes, the code system Relap5/mod3.2 was used to predict the thermal-hydraulic behavior of the NUR research reactor during a protected fast loss of flow accident. This was accomplished through the reactor core modeling by using a one-hot channel and an average one as well to present the remaining channels in the reactor core. Then, the transient variation of fuel, clad and coolant temperatures in both channels, further to, the safety criteria: - The critical heat flux ratio (CHFR) and – The onset of Flow Instability Ratio (OFIR) were evaluated and analyzed from safety point of view, where it was concluded that the occurrence of the protected fast loss of flow accident in NUR research reactor does not lead to any safety issue or damage to the fuel. This justified by the fact that, the clad peak values are 73.2°C and 55.3°C respectively for the hot and average channels in their first peak while they become equal to 72.7°C and 62.0°C in their second peak which are far below the limit value (450°C) during transients, in the other hand, the lower values of CHFR are 4.6 and 9.9 respectively for the hot and average channels in their first minimum point while they become equal to 3.4 and 7.7 in their second minimum point which does not fall below the imposed safety limit 1.5 during transients.

References

Almachi, J. C., Sánchez-Espinoza, V. H., & Imke, U. (2022). High-Fidelity Steady-State and Transient Simulations of an MTR Research Reactor Using Serpent2/Subchanflow. Energies, 15(4), 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041554

Almachi, J. C., Sánchez-Espinoza, V., Imke, U., Stieglitz, R., & Margulis, M. (2024). Validation of the dynamic simulation capabilities of Serpent2/Subchanflow using experimental data from the research reactor SPERT IV D-12/25. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 418, 112840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2023.112840

Al-Zain, J., Hajjaji, O. E., Bardouni, T. E., Basfar, A. A., Alnaser, I. A., Lahdour, M., Galahom, A. A., Boulaich, Y., Ahmed, A., & Mira, M. (2023). Development and implementation of a numerical simulation system for analyzing the thermal-hydraulic (T-H) characteristics of the MNSR research reactor fuel assembly. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 416, 112759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2023.112759

Arshi, S. S., Mirvakili, S., Khalafi, H., Ezati, A., & Tajbakhsh, A. (2017). Experimental validation of a modified RELAP5 model for transient analysis of Tehran research reactor mixed-core during fuel irradiation experiments. Progress In Nuclear Energy, 100, 11?21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.013

Azzoune, M. (2007). Etude de l’évolution des températures à l’intérieur du cœur et de la piscine du réacteur de recherche nucléaire « NUR » pour le mode de fonctionnement en convention naturelle. http://di.univ-blida.dz:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6403

Azzoune, M., Boumedien, A., Lababsa, D., Boulheouchat, M. E., & Ameur, A. (2018). Analysis of a loss-of-flow accident resulting from the primary pump shaft break transient of the NUR research reactor. Journal Of Nuclear Science And Technology, 56(1), 130?145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2018.1532845

Azzoune, M., Mammou, L., Boulheouchat, M., Zidi, T., Mokeddem, M., Belaid, S., Salah, A. B., Meftah, B., & Boumedien, A. (2010). NUR research reactor safety analysis study for long time natural convection (NC) operation mode. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 240(4), 823?831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.11.040

Azzoune, M., Sidi-Ali, K., Lababsa, D., & Mazidi, S. (2025). Analysis of a flow blockage accident in a plate-type fuel assembly using MCNP5 and RELAP5 codes at NUR nuclear research reactor. Annals Of Nuclear Energy, 225, 111708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111708

Boulaich, Y., Nacir, B., Bardouni, T. E., Boukhal, H., Chakir, E., Bakkari, B. E., & Younoussi, C. E. (2015). Transient behavior during reactivity insertion in the Moroccan TRIGA Mark II reactor using the PARET/ANL code. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 284, 247?250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.12.037

Boulaich, Y., Nacir, B., Bardouni, T. E., Zoubair, M., Bakkari, B. E., Merroun, O., Younoussi, C. E., Htet, A., Boukhal, H., & Chakir, E. (2010). Steady-state thermal-hydraulic analysis of the Moroccan TRIGA MARK II reactor by using PARET/ANL and COOLOD-N2 codes. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 241(1), 270?273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.10.033

Chatzidakis, S., Hainoun, A., Doval, A., Alhabet, F., Francioni, F., Ikonomopoulos, A., & Ridikas, D. (2014). A comparative assessment of independent thermal-hydraulic models for research reactors : The RSG-GAS case. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 268, 77?86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.11.076

Chatzidakis, S., Ikonomopoulos, A., & Ridikas, D. (2012). Evaluation of RELAP5/MOD3 behavior against loss of flow experimental results from two research reactor facilities. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 255, 321?329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.11.005

Cheridi, A. L. D., Dadda, A., Dahia, A., Saad, D., Bouam, A., Kentouche, A., & Khelfi, D. (2023). Flow blockage accident analysis in a multi purposes research reactor using Relap5 system code. Progress In Nuclear Energy, 168, 105019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.105019

Ferraro, D., Ferrari, I., Doval, A., Villarino, E., & Ozar, B. (2024). Highly-detailed neutronic and thermal-hydraulic coupled calculations for OPAL reactor using diverse codes and approaches. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 429, 113579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113579

Guo, Y., Wang, G., Qian, D., Yu, H., Hu, B., Guo, S., Mi, X., & Ma, J. (2018). Accident safety analysis of flow blockage in an assembly in the JRR-3M research reactor using system code RELAP5 and CFD code FLUENT. Annals Of Nuclear Energy, 122, 125?136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.08.031

Hainoun, A., Doval, A., Umbehaun, P., Chatzidakis, S., Ghazi, N., Park, S., Mladin, M., & Shokr, A. (2014). International benchmark study of advanced thermal hydraulic safety analysis codes against measurements on IEA-R1 research reactor. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 280, 233?250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.06.041

Hamidouche, T., Bousbia-Salah, A., Adorni, M., & D’Auria, F. (2004). Dynamic calculations of the IAEA safety MTR research reactor Benchmark problem using RELAP5/3.2 code. Annals Of Nuclear Energy, 31(12), 1385?1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2004.03.008

Hamidouche, T., Bousbia-Salah, A., Si-Ahmed, E. K., Mokeddem, M. Y., & D’Auria, F. (2009). Application of coupled code technique to a safety analysis of a standard MTR research reactor. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 239(10), 2104?2118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.06.002

Hammoud, A., Meftah, B., Azzoune, M., Radji, L., Zouhire, B., & Amina, M. (2014). Thermal-hydraulic behavior of the NUR nuclear research reactor during a fast loss of flow transient. Journal Of Nuclear Science And Technology, 51(9), 1154?1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2014.916235

Hastuti, E. P., Khakim, A., Suherkiman, H., Setiadipura, T., Irwanto, D., & Waris, A. (2025). Safety margin evaluation of RSG-GAS during LOFA considering ageing-induced degradation of coast-down flow and recent decay heat measurement. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 444, 114413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114413

Hedayat, A. (2017). Simulation and transient analyses of a complete passive heat removal system in a downward cooling pool-type material testing reactor against a complete station blackout and long-term natural convection mode using the RELAP5/3.2 code. Nuclear Engineering And Technology, 49(5), 953?967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.03.009

Hedayat, A., & Davari, A. (2022). Feasibility study to increase the reactor power at natural convection mode in Tehran Research Reactor (TRR) through a hybrid thermal-hydraulic simulation and analysis using the RELAP5 code and Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) modeling by ANSYS-FLUENT. Progress In Nuclear Energy, 150, 104285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104285

Hedayat, A., Davilu, H., & Jafari, J. (2007). Loss of coolant accident analyses on Tehran research reactor by RELAP5/MOD3.2 code. Progress In Nuclear Energy, 49(7), 511?528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.07.009

IAEA, (2014). Applications of Research Reactors. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NP-T-5.3, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 978–92–0–145010–4. https://www.iaea.org/publications/10491/applications-of-research-reactors

IAEA, 1992. Research Reactor Core Conversion Guidebook, Volume 3: Analytical Verification (Appendices G and H), IAEA-TECDOC-643/3, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

Ibrahim, S. M., El-Morshedy, S. E., & Abdelmaksoud, A. (2018). Thermal hydraulic analysis of core flow bypass in a typical research reactor. Nuclear Engineering And Technology, 51(1), 54?59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.08.021

INVAP S.E., (2001) Material Testing Reactors MTR_PC v 3.4 User’s Manual.

Jo, D., Park, J., & Chae, H. (2013). Development of thermal hydraulic and margin analysis code for steady state forced and natural convective cooling of plate type fuel research reactors. Progress In Nuclear Energy, 71, 39?51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2013.11.006

Kalimullah, M., Olson, A., Feldman, E., Hanan, N., Pham, S., Yoon, D., & Ozar, B. (2021). Verification and Validation of the PLTEMP/ANL Code for Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Experimental and Test Reactors (Code Version 4.3). https://doi.org/10.2172/1823263

Karimpour, M., & Esteki, M. H. (2014). Loss of coolant accident analyses on multi purpose research reactor by RELAP5/MOD3.2 code. Progress In Nuclear Energy, 79, 158?166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.11.006

Khakim, A., Hastuti, E. P., Rohanda, A., Dwijayanto, R. A. P., Adrial, H., & Yogatama, F. (2024). Safety analysis of inadvertent control rods withdrawal of RSG-GAS research reactor for various initial powers. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 426, 113405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113405

Meftah, B., Zidi, T., & Bousbia-Salah, A. (2006). Neutron flux optimization in irradiation channels at NUR research reactor. Annals Of Nuclear Energy, 33(14?15), 1164?1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2006.08.003

Nasir, R., Butt, M. K., Mirza, S. M., & Mirza, N. M. (2015a). Simultaneous multiple reactivity insertions in a typical MTR-type research reactor having U3Si2–Al fuel. Annals Of Nuclear Energy, 85, 869?878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.07.003

Nasir, R., Butt, M. K., Mirza, S. M., & Mirza, N. M. (2015b). Effect of high density dispersion fuels on transient behavior of MTR type research reactor under multiple reactivity transients. Progress In Nuclear Energy, 85, 511?517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.07.018

Obenchain, C. F., 1969. PARET – A Program for the Analysis of Reactor Transients. IDO-17282.

Olson, A., & Kalimullah, M. (2018). A User Guide to PARET/ANL (Rev.2). https://doi.org/10.2172/1463237

Omar, H., Ghazi, N., Alhabit, F., & Hainoun, A. (2010). Thermal hydraulic analysis of Syrian MNSR research reactor using RELAP5/Mod3.2 code. Annals Of Nuclear Energy, 37(4), 572?581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.12.021

Park, C., Tanimoto, M., Imaizumi, T., Miyauchi, M., Ito, M., Kaminaga, M., & Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Ibaraki (Japan). (2013). Preliminary accident analysis for a conceptual design of a 10 MW multi-purpose research reactor.

Puig, F., & Dennis, H. (2019). SLOWPOKE-2 alternative core loading configurations analysis for highly improved reactor performance. Annals Of Nuclear Energy, 128, 216?230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.12.016

Rahman, M., Hussain, Imtiaz, M., & Huda, M. (2012). Computational analysis of thermo-hydraulic behavior of TRIGA research reactor. Annals Of Nuclear Energy, 49, 48?56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.05.034

Rawashdeh, A. A., Cong, T., & Ali, M. M. (2022). Experimental and analytical natural circulation analysis of the Jordanian 5 MW research reactor using plate type fuel by RELAP5 MOD3.3. Annals Of Nuclear Energy, 175, 109233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109233

RELAP5/MOD3 code manual, June 1999. Code Structure, System Models, and Solution Methods, vols. I-V. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (NUREG/CR-5535).

Published

2026-03-17

How to Cite

Hamed, D. (2026). Reactor Core Behavior of NUR Research Reactor during a Protected Fast Loss of Flow Accident. Energy and Thermofluids Engineering, 5, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.38208/ete.v5.1175